| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Our Free online poker tables Discuss about our free tables here, converts your forums credits into play money, find news and next upcoming features! |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| First b4 i advise the site with my idea i will explain why i know that it will probably work to help cut down on the lag and other things. so let me explain. i am an amuteur webmaster. i have plenty of sites and one of them is an animations website where people can use the animated graphics that i have placed there. Now there are over 1000 animations and when i first put about 60 or 70 on the home page it was fine but the more that i put there the longer it took to open the page. so i created many manypages and now the site doesnt hardly take any time at all to load any of the pages. so i will bet that if op66 put certain tables on different pages and split all the tables up into 5 or 6 different pages that members could go to ONE page where there is a link to accesss 5 or 6 other pages where the tables are all at but in different catagories then ALL memberds will not be on the same page and ALL tables will not be on the same page. I ma sure because of my experience with this that it will help the lag. the home page could have a link or links to all info that newbies would need to know and then there would be a link to all the 1000k buyin ring tables and then there could be a link to all the middle range ring tables and also a link to the big money buy in ring tables. then there would aslo be links to the mini tourny tables as far as their buyin is concerned and then a link to the multi table tournys where they will be listed. GRANTED i knowthat this is a lot of work seeting up all the pages and putting the info there and linking all the other pages and all that but when it wwas finished then it will be there forever and i know that if this was done then it would definitly reduce the amount of lag significantly. I hope that op66 doesnt think that i am implying that they dont know what they were doing but ill bet that if op66 knew that the lag and other things would become a problem when too many people joined then they woulda set the site up in a different manner and i am just suggesting they they consider a change. oh i dont think i made it clear that on the home page a link to a buch of tables in the same buyin range would take the members to a completely different website then here and if only 80 or 90 members where at one site and 50 on anojhter and 36 on anohter then wouldnt the lag be much less then if all members are on the same page??????????? Last edited by MichaelVitelli; 08-14-2008 at 04:55 PM.. Reason: forgot something |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| well thought out mike three gold stars lol |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| wow that could work and it should work well thougt out m8 ![]()
__________________ liverpool r us http://www.onlinepoker66.com/forum/group.php?groupid=9 also staring Justice For The 96. http://www.onlinepoker66.com/forum/g...icegroupid=131 you'll never walk alone |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Without a paragraph answer are you saying that this is going to take the stress of the server thus reducing the lag? |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Surely these suggestions are already in place? Process Hosting 101.
__________________ Percentage of boys brought to the yard by my milkshake: 100% |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| no bass i really dont know like i said im a ametuer but it really alloowed people who came to my site to load the pages very quickly when they couldnt when all the animations were on the same page and im not absoluetly ceertain but i believe that bandwitdth or not enough of it will make a page hard to open and cause it to run slow and that is a reason wwhy no moving graphics are aloowed her as avartars and if there were 6 tables pages that were at 6 entirely different websites that all conected to op66 then if there was a lot of bandwidth on a tables page and less members playing then i know that everything on that page would run faster. but like i said i dont know im just an ametuer but it did work for a couple of my sites that have a lot of content. im just trying to help lol |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| It's called redundancy MV. And it would only really speed things up when a lot of the tables were empty.
__________________ Percentage of boys brought to the yard by my milkshake: 100% |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| MV could u start usin paragraphs please lol |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| I like the idea |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I just think that they need to stop running Java scripts, and use something newer. ![]() |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| well i got lost after the first line but wd i'm sure lol xxxx |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| it would be great if that worked.. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Nice idea if it worked.... |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Actually I don't think java is the problem. As a matter of fact i think java its the best option. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| And nice idea MichaelVitelli I'm pretty sure that would work good and get rid of most of the lag. ps: use paragraphs please lol =) |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| our idea is nice but the bandwidth of the site, usages and such will surel increase alot? meaning there will need to be more mone to run the site? i am not sure though as i onl read half our plan i got bored i am sorry :P big chunks of text just throw me off. After building alot of sites and managing them i found mself doing everthing i could to keep costs down, how will this not make costs a bigger issue? i mean the lag fix is nice, but it comes at a price do you not think?
__________________ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |