City Slaves Challenges...

[jimggoldwing]

OK, I know there was another thread... but here's an issue that I'd like to raise...

I was challenged early today by lblancer... he lost... he came back and beat me a short bit later and I lost... I counted that as my LOSS for the day, right???

So, I set my guy to dealing and left for appointments but was surprised to see on my return that I lost yet AGAIN to a challenge by Harvey, taking $3,600 in the process.

We need clarification... this is BS that we are losing money when we are seemingly following the rules of the game. Here are the logs of the three losses:

1. Challenged by lblancer
Summary of the fight between lblancer and jimggoldwing ( Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:31:20 -0800GMT )
jimggoldwing is the winner! ( 238 Hitpoints lost against 159 )
( grabbing 2 experience points )

2. Re-Challenged by lblancer
Summary of the fight between lblancer and jimggoldwing ( Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:51:31 -0800GMT )
lblancer is the winner! ( 63 Hitpoints lost against 42 )
( grabbing 6 experience points + 1 glory point! )

3. Challenged by Harvey
Summary of the fight between harvey and jimggoldwing ( Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:19:21 -0800GMT )
harvey is the winner! ( 208 Hitpoints lost against 125 )
( grabbing 10 experience points + 1 glory point! and steal 3.600$ ( Join a clan to bank your cash and protect it! ))


I look forward to a positive response.

--goldwing

[saladdodger]

Strange one jim, only 2 reasons i can think why.
have you challenged harvey in last 3 days?
could be a replica.
or had we changed over to the new day reset between challenges?

[Quagan]

hehe for you it was all 3 challenge today.

but for cityslave you was challenged 2 time yesterday and 1 time today

look the days 21 // 22

[BlackLava]

Day 1 : You win first fight ( Mon, 21 )
Day 1 : You lose second one ( Mon, 21 )
Day 2 : You lose first fight ( Tue, 22 )
I'm not sure to understand the issue, double checked the times in database and you've copied those too : Different days (server time matter)...

Sorry if I miss something, we will investigate further then for sure

[jimggoldwing]

Yeah, it does look like I was victimized by the server clock... good grief.

On the upside, I fired off a replica at him and got 3,000 back (of the 3,600 he abscounded with).

[Quagan]

yes but he can do a replica on you now

[jimggoldwing]

yep... which is why I am not leaving any cash on the table!

[Shrooms]

ok 3 times today I have been challenged 3 times today have have lost all so how can this happen......once yes but 3 chuffin times and no it is not replica`s.

[BlackLava]

Originally Posted by Shrooms

ok 3 times today I have been challenged 3 times today have have lost all so how can this happen......once yes but 3 chuffin times and no it is not replica`s.

Please specify your CitySlaves nickname or PM me it (I see no Shrooms there)

[BlackLava]

Checked your challenges Shrooms and again I don't see the issue there... Replicas mean your target got 3 days after your attack to replicate for free (about GP) and no matter the case (even if you've lost through the current day).
It looks like quite the same story than for jimggoldwing (about server time for new day) plus a replica story behind (you have attacked one of the players attacking you through the past 3 days).

[Shrooms]

this morning about 7.55am (uk time) i got challenged by iblancer. Then about 8.05am i got challenged by iblancer and lost AGAIN. Then about 8.15am this morning, i got challenged by HOPE IM LUCKY and lost, so after 8am UK time, that meant i lost 2 challenges whereas i think i should only have lost one and then cant get challenged for the next 24 hours.

ok, so i must have challenged HOPE IM LUCKY in the last 3 days, for him to have done a replica??

anyway its quite hard to get my head round, the way it works

[BlackLava]

yes that's it, as you've challenged one of your attackers (sorry I've closed the stats now not sure which of the 2 it was) he was able to hit you back even after your defeat... And the day change finished the work to make everything messy here
After those reports we've double checked the codings and tested : Found no issue so far from our tests.