Go Back   OnlinePoker66 Forum : Your daily poker board! > Online Poker 66 : NL Texas holdem, Omaha & 7stud! > General Poker Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Poker Discussion Discuss all about poker here - Post poker news too if you know some!

View Poll Results: which suits your game best
RING TABLES 3 7.69%
SIT & GO (MINI TORNEYS 14 35.90%
MULTI TABLE TOURNEYS 22 56.41%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2009
The Cookie Monster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,938
Credits: 1,616,922
Default Your Prefered Nl Hold'em Tables

what type of tables do you think suits your game best ??

for me it's probably sit&go's, then multi table tourney's


Ring Tables
Sit & Go tournaments
Multi-table tournaments

Last edited by T_B_H; 01-19-2009 at 10:37 AM..
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2009
Kingcard's Avatar
King of the buffet table
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Location:Location
Posts: 2,699
Credits: 535,352
[QUOTE=TheBountyHunter;227763]what type of tables do you think suits your game best ??
The one where i take your chips m8...i LOVE that table...lol...
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2009
TheDonkey66's Avatar
The Donkey
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.Ireland (norn iron)
Posts: 1,070
Credits: 440,937
I prefer sit and go 500k or 250k if I get one set up that is
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2009
MrRoyal's Avatar
Poker King
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 160
Credits: 10,865
For me it's probably MTT, Ring, Heads up and then SnG.

I tend to find my game strong on a full table or when down to heads up but I always seem to struggle with 3-5 people. Hence I tend to quite often make the late stages of MTTs (although I then go out on the final table) and also do well on ring tables (although I don't enjoy them as much). I think have a good record at heads up but I always do well early at SnGs then go out (I do better at turbos).

Would be interesting (although probably too difficult to code) to have a stats page for each player. Win/losses at heads up, average position at SnGs and MTTs, etc.
__________________
You gotta know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em. For hints and tips click here

My Outlaws City bluff http://www.onlinepoker66.com/rpg/bluff.php?id=32202
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2009
Danzi's Avatar
King of Heart
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Afganistan
Posts: 1,847
Credits: 5,427,318
1. Multi table tourneys
2. sit and go
3. ring tables ( won 20m today but would give them for gold in wombats tourney today that i lost).


Always harder challenge for me too beat 50 or more players in big tourney than win some all ins at kofth.
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2009
jockney's Avatar
King of Hats
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East end of Glasgow. Scotland
Posts: 6,140
Credits: 2,132,878,630
Multi's for me all the way, I miss the old Sit & go's like the Bazultra , the new ones are ok , but I cant be bothered waiting for them to fill up. I dont play ring tables very often , too many all-Iner's and daft callers for my liking.
__________________
My Hovercraft is full of Eels
Click here to find a quick way to get credits
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2009
Poker Emperor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 532
Credits: 5,833
sit & go's for me,
multi-table tourney's next (though they are my favorite, my head's not always in the game),
and if you ever see me on a ring table you know they're the only ones available.
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2009
stepoff's Avatar
Poker Emperor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,422
Credits: 8,187,603
I Like The Torneys And A 6 To 10 Player Sit And Go.. I Try And Stay Away From The Ring Tables Onle Because You Tend To Get A Lot Of "all In" Players That Mess Your Hands Up Before The Flop.. Just My Opinion...
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2009
stepoff's Avatar
Poker Emperor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,422
Credits: 8,187,603
P.s. Jockney I Just Read Your Response After I Posted Mine,, I Agree 100% Pal!!
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2009
ARSENALRULES's Avatar
Poker Champion
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 790
Credits: 16,005,161
like tourneys but dont have time to play for 3 hours at a time which is what it takes to win a big op tourney. so voted ring tables as i can play for a little while before doing some work.
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-19-2009
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: falkirk/bo'ness, scotland
Posts: 5,990
Credits: 263,731
i play my best if im in a sit and go with all my chips..stupid i know but if ya dont risk it u wont win big thats how i play..i feel i tighten up when i know im broke if i loose so it improves my game
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-19-2009
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Doncaster, England
Posts: 3,647
Credits: 29,581,421
Send a message via MSN to Pocket_Ducks
I'll vote ring tables, but it really does depend on the mood i'm in. Lately i've been doing rubbish in MTT's cos i feel urges of impatientness bouncing off playing pot after pot on the ring tables (small stakes). Yet if i first come in and don't play anything else, i would probz play better in the tournies.

As for what wins the most, well i guess ring tables (NL1000 mostly) closely followed by S & G's (anything from 10k-250k both heads up and 6-10 seater, depends whetha i'm feeling lucky or not

kwak
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-19-2009
OP66fozzy's Avatar
Pokerholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Derby UK
Posts: 1,968
Credits: 30,490,804
Send a message via MSN to OP66fozzy
It's all the same to me Kev, as long as I get my poker fix, I don't care where I'm playing.

On the old site, it would have been the mini tourneys, but that was down to the bonus chips available. After the first few weeks there, I never played the ring tables. But on the new script, the ring tables are where the action is, so I play those ( reasonably successfully, over 40 million at the moment ) .

MTT's are fun and it's nice to accumulate medals, though I do find silver is a rare metal that mostly passes me by.

Equally, if I want a fun game, without huge risk, I will sign up to a non op66 tourney with a set start time.

So any table is good for me, as long as we are playing poker.
__________________
Boys know how to swear, men know when to swear.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3rnxQBizoU

Please be kind enough to click my bluff

http://www.onlinepoker66.com/rpg/bluff.php?id=1473
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-19-2009
bamarolltide's Avatar
BAMA STYLE
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: north central mississippi usa
Posts: 357
Credits: 2,233,072
Send a message via MSN to bamarolltide
voted multi tourney tables but will play some sit and go 1v1
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-20-2009
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,360
Credits: 599,770
voted sitngo (i live in hope they get back to normal) sadly for me, this last week in the MTT felt as if i was playing on a bingo ring table...dunno wots goin on here kids but i'm losing interest in these things. i didnt even bother entering last night...sad
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-20-2009
jim1961's Avatar
Poker Emperor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 963
Credits: 683,132
I love the sit n go's - just isn't enough of them
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-20-2009
CaptainSandy's Avatar
Poker Captain
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North east
Posts: 2,437
Credits: 1,141,286,197
I only played sit and go before switch but it doesn't seem to be an option now, mainly because the table has to be full before the game commences (the bonus never bothered me).
MTT next - doing well in a MTT is a goood feeling.
Ring tables last, big advantage to those with most chips in their bank as they tend to bet big cos aren't bothered if they lose a million chips or so.
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-20-2009
stjimmy's Avatar
stjammy
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new milton, hampshire, england.
Posts: 4,864
Credits: 1,716,105,696
i`m the same as you kev. mini`s then multis then rings...
__________________
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-21-2009
The Cookie Monster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,938
Credits: 1,616,922
ok this all now makes sense to me, hardly anyone likes the ring table above sit and go's/multi table's...

but everyone plays them and not the mini's
Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-21-2009
Tb1rd's Avatar
Hearshot Kid
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Gloucester/England
Posts: 3,436
Credits: 3,963,934
Send a message via MSN to Tb1rd
Multi tables all the way, better standard of play compared to anything else, a longer more committed experience and takes will to carry on to win.

Used to love and be a string sit and go player, but seeing as i dont get to play them much i dont think i play them as well as i could.

Hate ring tables.

I suck heads up.
__________________

Digg this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios